This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patch: [commited] DWARF2 location lists vs. shared libraries

From: Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay at redhat dot com>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 13:32:24 -0400
Subject: Re: Patch: [commited] DWARF2 location lists vs. shared libraries
References: <40983940.3050003@redhat.com> <20040505040344.GA28793@nevyn.them.org> <vt23c6f2zbf.fsf@zenia.home> <409C1C42.2010908@redhat.com> <20040512013456.GA12569@nevyn.them.org> <vt2k6zhpakf.fsf@zenia.home>

FYI: I've checked this in.

Thanks

Bryce

Jim Blandy wrote:

2004-05-07 Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay@redhat.com>

* dwarf2loc.c (find_location_expression): Use ANOFFSET to adjust base_address for shared libraries.

It looks right to me. Jim?

Yes, looks good. Bryce, do you have commit access to GDB?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Patch: [commited] DWARF2 location lists vs. shared libraries
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Patch: [commited] DWARF2 location lists vs. shared libraries
  - From: Jim Blandy

References:
- Patch: DWARF2 location lists vs. shared libraries
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Patch: DWARF2 location lists vs. shared libraries
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Patch: DWARF2 location lists vs. shared libraries
  - From: Jim Blandy
- Re: Patch: DWARF2 location lists vs. shared libraries
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Patch: DWARF2 location lists vs. shared libraries
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Patch: DWARF2 location lists vs. shared libraries
  - From: Jim Blandy

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]