This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [rfc] Fixes for sim and gdb gdb_mbuild.sh failures



The others were all warnings.  Two are dead fix_call_dummy's, one is a
printf format string warning (sizeof is size_t, which is not necessarily
long), and three are long 64-bit constants without suffixes.  The last I'm
least sure about.  ia64-tdep.c already used the LL suffix, but alpha-tdep.c
and amd64-tdep.c didn't.  I'm slightly worried that a native Alpha (Compaq)
compiler will complain about the LL syntax (since CORE_ADDR may be just a
long in that case, and I remember Compaq's compiler as being remarkably
pedantic).  Joel (or someone else), I don't suppose you could test this
patch by building GDB on OSF/1?

There must be something in src/include to portably handle `LL' - what does bfd do? It isn't ISO-C '90.


Andrew (thanks)



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]