This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Introduce notion of "search name"


Paul Hilfinger <hilfingr@gnat.com> writes:
> > I have to say, I think our allocation rules are hairy enough already.
> > If there is some better solution on the horizon for lazy demangling's
> > allocation, I am relucantant to put in complex and slow mechanisms,
> > even temporarily.  It's a step backwards, justified by work that isn't
> > even scheduled.
> >
> > Paul, how critical is this to the intent of your change?  I haven't
> > reviewed it.
> 
> Sorry, I'm not sure what that pesky pronoun "this" refers to here.

I meant lazily demangling the names.  I was wondering if the
demangling could be done at minsym reading time, or psymtab->symtab
conversion time, as the other languages do, when there is an
appropriate objfile available.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]