Re: [PATCH] Classify non-POD struct types more or less correctly on AMD64

[Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>]

Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl> writes:

| The 1996 ANSI C++ draft has the following statement about non-POD-ness:

using an old oudated document may lead to confusion (luckily, that is
not the case here).

|   "A POD-struct is an aggregate class that has no non-static data members
                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|   of type pointer to member, non-POD-struct, non-POD- union (or array of
|   such types) or reference, and has no user-defined copy assignment
|   operator and no user-defined destructor. Similarly, a POD-union is an
|   aggregate union that has no non-static data members of type pointer to
|   member, non-POD-struct, non-POD-union (or array of such types) or
|   reference, and has no user-defined copy assignment operator and no
|   user-defined destructor. A POD class is a class that is either a
|   POD-struct or a POD-union."
| 
| So it doesn't say anything about baseclasses.

Sure it does.  A POD-struct ought to be an aggregate class, and an
aggregate class does not have base classes.

-- Gaby