This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
[I think this patch was sort of pre-approved by Andrew, which explains why I put "patch" in the subject, but I prefered to make sure and ask for approval again. Hence the RFA] Hello, This change is related to a discussion started in the following thread: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-12/msg00037.html In particular, this implements the suggestion made by Andrew in the following message: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-12/msg00279.html This patch implements the first part, which is to extract the code inside the we-stepped-into-a-function if block, and move it to its own function. It's fairly mechanical. The next step will be to change the if condition itself to separate out the targets where the new frame code is used from the ones where the old one is still in use. I will send a patch as soon as this one is reviewed. 2003-12-19 J. Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com> * infrun.c (handle_step_into_function): New function. (handle_inferior_event): Extract out some code into the new function above. Tested on x86-linux, no regressions. Ok to commit? Thanks, -- Joel
Attachment:
infrun.c.diff
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |