Re: [rfc] New files "memory.[hc]"

[Kevin Buettner <kevinb at redhat dot com>]

On Oct 27, 10:39am, Andrew Cagney wrote:

> > On Oct 24,  4:48pm, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > 
> >> What do people think of putting the new (with target parameter) methods, 
> >> that wrap target_{read,write} in a new file "memory.[hc]"?  I think they 
> >> are going to end up cluttering up "target.[hc]".
> > 
> > Sounds okay to me.
> 
> But is it a good idea, as in will it make the code easier to read, find, 
> and understand?  The old target-memory routines are all "hidden" (well i 
> think they are :-) in gdbcore.h and corefile.c

I know it's kind of long, but how about "target-memory.[hc]" ?

Kevin