This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFC: Use program_transform_name correctly
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 17:50:28 -0400
- Subject: Re: RFC: Use program_transform_name correctly
- References: <vt265j0hgj4.fsf@zenia.home>
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 04:41:35PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote:
>
> It seems as if some Makefiles aren't properly using
> program_transform_name.
>
> The same kind of weirdness corrected(?) in the patch below appears in
> gdb/Makefile.in, so I'm not at all sure I'm not misunderstanding
> what's going on. If folks agree that the change below would be
> correct, then I'll put together a larger patch that fixes the ones I
> can find elsewhere, too.
>
> (Not sure why this hasn't come up before; Daniel J.'s recent posts on
> the topic seem to be about setting program_transform_name, not on how
> to use it.)
That is _bizarre_. Does it even give you anything but a sed error now?
> 2003-10-07 Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
>
> * Makefile.in (RUNTEST_FOR_TARGET): Pass the transformation to set
> properly.
>
> Index: gdb/testsuite//Makefile.in
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/cvsfiles/devo/gdb/testsuite/Makefile.in,v
> retrieving revision 1.66
> diff -c -r1.66 Makefile.in
> *** gdb/testsuite//Makefile.in 9 Sep 2003 21:03:53 -0000 1.66
> --- gdb/testsuite//Makefile.in 7 Oct 2003 21:33:22 -0000
> ***************
> *** 53,59 ****
> if [ "$(host_canonical)" = "$(target_canonical)" ]; then \
> echo runtest; \
> else \
> ! t='$(program_transform_name)'; echo runtest | sed -e '' $$t; \
> fi; \
> fi`
>
> --- 53,59 ----
> if [ "$(host_canonical)" = "$(target_canonical)" ]; then \
> echo runtest; \
> else \
> ! t='$(program_transform_name)'; echo runtest | sed -e '$$t'; \
> fi; \
> fi`
That's certainly what it's supposed to look like.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer