This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: Don't include value of expression in pc-fp.exp test name

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>, jimb at redhat dot com
Cc: carlton at kealia dot com, fnasser at redhat dot com,gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 11:31:22 -0400
Subject: Re: RFA: Don't include value of expression in pc-fp.exp test name
References: <200309301749.h8UHnZkE029086@duracef.shout.net>

Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net> writes:
Yeah! It makes my life easier!

You need to add '2003' to the copyright year to the top of pc-fp.exp.
Proofread.  Tested on my test bed with 10 configurations.
All the gdb.sum's come out identical now.
Fantastic. I think this deserves mention in NEWS.

As Michael well knows, supplemental information, such as which specific branch of a test passed or failed can be included in paren in the test message. Any analysis tools comparing test results needs to accomodate this convention.

If you really want to remove this specific output, then what ever. However, please don't start removing the supplemental information willy nilly. Instead, fix your script.

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFA: Don't include value of expression in pc-fp.exp test name
  - From: David Carlton

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]