This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Properly define SSE registers for cygwin targets

From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis at chello dot nl>
To: cgf at redhat dot com
Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 17:46:45 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Properly define SSE registers for cygwin targets
References: <20030913022759.GA2225@redhat.com> <200309131102.h8DB2xvx077846@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <20030913155157.GA15291@redhat.com>

   Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:51:57 -0400
   From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>

   Another question:  If HAVE_SSE_REGS was eliminated from all source files
   why wasn't it eliminated from win32-nat.c?  Did I miss a memo?

Well, I'm pretty sure I've burried a comment about Cygwin still using
HAVE_SSE_REGS somewhere in a comment of one of the zillion
i386-specific patches over the last year.  Do you want me to drop you
a note if something Cygwin-specific comes up?

Mark

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Properly define SSE registers for cygwin targets
  - From: Christopher Faylor

References:
- [PATCH] Properly define SSE registers for cygwin targets
  - From: Christopher Faylor
- Re: [PATCH] Properly define SSE registers for cygwin targets
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: [PATCH] Properly define SSE registers for cygwin targets
  - From: Christopher Faylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]