This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] parse and eval breakpoint conditions with correct language

From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at gnat dot com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
Cc: Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:31:59 -0700
Subject: Re: [RFA] parse and eval breakpoint conditions with correct language
References: <20030910015400.GS423@gnat.com> <vt24qzkr1p1.fsf@zenia.home> <20030911180920.GD945@gnat.com> <3F60CB0C.5060504@redhat.com>

> I've been wondering if this language stuff was going to interact badly 
> with breakpoints.  Anyway, is it possible to create an equivalent gcj 
> test case since gcj is likely more accessable to developers?

It's probably possible, but I don't have gcj and I've never programed in
Java. So I'd like to leave this part to the contributors that do use
Java.

-- 
Joel

References:
- [RFA] parse and eval breakpoint conditions with correct language
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [RFA] parse and eval breakpoint conditions with correct language
  - From: Jim Blandy
- Re: [RFA] parse and eval breakpoint conditions with correct language
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [RFA] parse and eval breakpoint conditions with correct language
  - From: Andrew Cagney

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]