This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [rfa/6.0] Fix a thinko in dwarf2loc


On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 03:32:45PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Any variable with DW_OP_reg* requires a frame to read it - what
> symbol_read_needs_frame () really means is "is this variable meaningful when
> the program is not running".
> 
> This would show up in the testsuite, but GCC doesn't tend to put locals in
> registers without optimization or register keywords everywhere.  Symptom is
> that a watchpoint was not deleted when we left its scope, since we thought
> it was global.
> 
> OK?

Ping...

[Does dwarf2loc fall under the maintenance umbrella of the dwarf2
reader?]

> 2003-08-01  Daniel Jacobowitz  <drow@mvista.com>
> 
> 	* dwarf2loc.c (dwarf2_loc_desc_needs_frame): Variables in a
> 	register do need a frame.
> 
> --- gdb-5.3.20030801/gdb/dwarf2loc.c.orig	2003-08-01 14:58:57.000000000 -0400
> +++ gdb-5.3.20030801/gdb/dwarf2loc.c	2003-08-01 15:00:05.000000000 -0400
> @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ dwarf2_loc_desc_needs_frame (unsigned ch
>  
>    free_dwarf_expr_context (ctx);
>  
> -  return baton.needs_frame;
> +  return baton.needs_frame || ctx->in_reg;
>  }
>  
>  static void
> 
> 

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]