This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Re: Analyzing AMD64 corefiles on i386


On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 03:38:08PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>    Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 13:03:06 +0200
>    From: Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>
> 
>    This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>    --------------050406070409000508090803
>    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
>    Mark Kettenis told me that:
>    >    Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 14:43:49 +0200
>    >    From: Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>
>    > 
>    >    Hi,
>    >    what must be done to enable reading of AMD64 corefiles in a gdb running 
>    >    on i386 with --target=amd64?
>    > 
>    > The necessary support for corefiles needs to be added to
>    > x86-64-linux-tdep.c.  Take a look at i386nbsd-tdep.c for an example.
>    > You'll need to create a `struct core_fns' together with the necessary
>    > support functions, and register it with add_core_fns.  Note that for
>    > the support functions you can't rely on definitions in header files
>    > and such since this is target code.  You'll also need to drop
>    > core-regset.o from NATDEPFILES in x86-64-linux.mh.
> 
>    How about the attached one? Works for me on cross-gdb i386->amd64 as 
>    well as in native amd64 gdb. Can I apply it?
> 
> Not as such.  We can't allow public functions with the names
> supply_gregset and fill_gregset in *-tdep.c files.  Therefore these
> functions should be renamed, and supply_gregset and fill_gregset
> should be kept in your *-nat.c file.  You'll probably want to rewrite
> those functions such that they call the new functions in *-tdep.c.

I don't see the harm.  They need to be multi-arched instead of called
by name, eventually, but it's no extra work to rename them at that
time.

But that's just my personal opinion.

> Personally I wouldn't define all those constants if the only place
> where they'll be used is the regmap array, but that's a matter of
> taste.

I'm guessing it makes it easier to at-a-glance compare with
<sys/reg.h>.  I did the same thing.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]