This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA/ARM] Framificate the ARM port [3/3]

Just in case you're wondering.

This would break any architecture that didn't have an FP called "fp". This is because, "$fp" defaults to get_frame_base() ... :-(


Argh!

:-)

get_frame_base_address defaults to get_frame_base; I could update
value_of_builtin_frame_fp_reg safely, I think.  But I have no idea
where that would end up, so I'm going to defer to your judgement on
this if you've got a preference...

kfail arm-*-* gdb/497?

Having value_of_builtin_frame_fp_reg return get_frame_base_address is certainly more correct. The intent was for $fp to return the ABI's virtual frame base register.

Try it.

PS: ARM $fp confusion fixed?
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=479


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]