This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [i386newframe/PATCH] New i386newframe branch


   > +  return &i386_frame_unwind;
   > +}

Have you tried adding just the sigtramp unwinder? I should get just that addition debugged regardless - it should make migrating other ISAs easier.

No I haven't.  I don't think I can.  The problem is that I simplified
the sigtramp unwinder a bit.  However in order to do so, I need to be
able to trust the normal unwinder to unwind the stack pointer
correctly.  Unfortunately the current code is a bit sloppy about this.

Ah, yes, I know the feeling. Tighten the camshaft cover, and a push-rods slips. Put that back, and the .... Some times it's easier to just replace the engine.


It is unfortunatly something of an all or nothing afair. I might still get curious though to see just what happens.

Andrew



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]