Re: [RFA] varobj: call CHECK_TYPEDEF

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>]

> On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 13:35, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>
> > Don't forget a gdb.mi/insight219 testcase.
>
>
> Doh! How about the attached? (This is the minimal test that I could get
> to reproduce it. It must use multiple files. That's why it never showed
> up before, apparently.)

Yes, anything like that.  BTW, does ...

struct t
{
  int a;
  int b;
};

typedef struct t T;

main()
{
  static T v = {...};
}

tickle it?


> Index: insight219-b.cc
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: insight219-b.cc
> diff -N insight219-b.cc
> --- /dev/null	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
> +++ insight219-b.cc	24 Apr 2003 21:54:00 -0000
> @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
> +#include "insight219.h"
> +
> +B::~B() {}
> +


> Index: insight219.cc
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: insight219.cc
> diff -N insight219.cc
> --- /dev/null	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
> +++ insight219.cc	24 Apr 2003 21:54:00 -0000
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +#include "insight219.h"
> +
> +int
> +main(int argc, char *argv[])
> +{
> +  B *b = new B();
> +  return 0;
> +};
> Index: insight219.h
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: insight219.h
> diff -N insight219.h
> --- /dev/null	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
> +++ insight219.h	24 Apr 2003 21:54:00 -0000
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +class B
> +{
> +public:
> +    virtual ~B();
> +
> +private:
> +    int b;
> +};