This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: patch to add QNX NTO i386 support

That being said, I'm of the opinion that exec-file should be unconditional.
If symbol-file is set to one thing and exec-file to another, should gdb even
need to check to see if exec-file exists?  I haven't looked to see what info
exec-file seems to feel it needs from the binary but I figure the run
command will discover that the exec file isn't there and report an error
itself.  Then, in our case, the run command spawns on the remote and
everyone is happy and we don't need a special command.

Good point. Would a doco / code comparison be better to see if what currently goes on makes sense?

Andrew


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]