This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch/rfc] gdb.c++/templates.exp, pr gdb/1063
- From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- To: carlton at math dot stanford dot edu, drow at mvista dot com
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 20:00:43 -0600
- Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] gdb.c++/templates.exp, pr gdb/1063
David C writes:
> In that case, I don't think that the desire of the original test case
> (i.e. printing out actual template info) is reasonable: it's not the
> job of GDB's test suite to lobby for improvements in debugging
> formats.
I agree with this philosophy.
> So I think the proper behavior is to delete the original success
> regexps, to decide that, in this situation, GDB shouldn't print out any
> information (which is what currently happens with GCC 2.95.3/stabs), to
> KFAIL the situations where it does print out an instantiation with
> reference to a PR about nested classes (I assume we have such a PR, if
> not I'll create one), and to close PR 1063 with an appropriate comment.
Sounds okay.
I'll throw away your first patch then and chill out for the second one.
Test bed and eyeballs are standing by. :)
Michael C