This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfa/doco] FRAME_FP -> read_fp
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 19:22:49 -0500
- Subject: Re: [rfa/doco] FRAME_FP -> read_fp
- References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1021120075713.24803C-100000@is> <3DDBB787.firstname.lastname@example.org> <2593-Wed20Nov2002192004email@example.com>
Really old thread:
Eli, I'm dropping this patch. Instead, I'm doing the full rewrite.
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:25:43 -0500
From: Andrew Cagney <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Ahm, what does this mean, exactly, "read_fp in the machine description"?
> Isn't read_fp a function? If so, how can it be present ``in the machine
return TARGET_READ_FP ();
and TARGET_READ_FP() is part of the machine description (a.k.a.
Yes, but still I find it confusing to tell that a function is in the
machine description. A machine description is a bunch of macros and
machine-specific functions, right? And read_fp is neither of these,
Hmm, I guess this could do with a similar s/FP_REGNUM/read_fp/