This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch/rfc] Remove all setup_xfail's from testsuite/gdb.mi/
- From: David Carlton <carlton at math dot stanford dot edu>
- To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- Cc: fnasser at redhat dot com, ac131313 at redhat dot com, drow at mvista dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 17 Jan 2003 11:20:30 -0800
- Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Remove all setup_xfail's from testsuite/gdb.mi/
- References: <200301171900.h0HJ03A04642@duracef.shout.net><ro1y95j37tr.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
On 17 Jan 2003 11:16:48 -0800, David Carlton <carlton@math.Stanford.EDU> said:
> I'm gradually going through the current non-{PASS,KFAIL} results
> that I see on my test runs in gdb.c++, and investigating them; I'm
> not distinguishing between XFAIL and FAIL (and XPASS, for that
> matter) when doing so. Once I'm done with that, I'll move on to the
> xfail's that I don't see; I've noticed that there are an awful lot
> of DWARF 1 ones, which I assume actually are legit.
Also, one thing I've noticed is that the string "FIXME" occurs a fair
number of times in gdb.c++, with a similar meaning to XFAIL (and
typically used in combination with XFAIL). That's another thing that
has to be audited.
David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu