This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC/RFA] New 'to' command
Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 04:09:51PM -0500, Elena Zannoni wrote:
> > Fernando Nasser writes:
> > > Sorry to get back to the name thing. But I believe the discussion concentrated
> > > more on the semantics of the two commands and how until would be implemented --
> > > nobody was specifically fond of the names that came up in any case.
> > >
> > > What about "advance-to"? You can add "to" as an alias, I don't mind (although I
> > > don't thing we need/should as typing "adv" will suffice)..
> > >
> > > I believe it captures the idea of what the user is trying to do in this case.
> > I like it.
> > going once, going twice, sold ?
> Until stays in this stack frame, advance-to goes to anything as long as
> the frame doesn't exit? Sold to me. Thanks for the name, Fernando!
yes, until is untouched. Same as it was. Advance is for the new command.
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer