This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFC: gdb.c++/main-falloff.exp (a new KFAIL)
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- Cc: carlton at math dot stanford dot edu, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 16:49:46 -0500
- Subject: Re: RFC: gdb.c++/main-falloff.exp (a new KFAIL)
- References: <200301032145.h03Lj3Q19841@duracef.shout.net>
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 03:45:03PM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> As David C mentioned, gdb_test_multiple cannot replace send_gdb/gdb_expect,
> because there is no room in the syntax to add TCL code blocks
> which some tests use to check compiler version, target version.
That's why we don't have a fixed syntax yet. I have some better ideas.
> > If it's bugging you that bad I'll do it or something similar tomorrow
> > morning.
>
> That would be great.
>
> But: is it okay with you if we de-couple these things and proceed
> with the KFAIL bacchanal?
>
> Michael C
> pushy new yorker
No, please wait until tomorrow so that I can give you something less
error prone.
Daniel J
pushy pittsburgher