This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA/testsuite] Handle MIPS in step-test.exp

From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>,gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 10:28:24 -0500
Subject: Re: [RFA/testsuite] Handle MIPS in step-test.exp
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <20021022020218.GA22839@nevyn.them.org> <3DB55E72.3060700@redhat.com> <20021022142537.GA16933@nevyn.them.org> <3DE51501.3000504@redhat.com>


Andrew Cagney wrote:

On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 10:19:30AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>The MIPS PIC calling conventions have a $gp register which needs to be
>reloaded after function calls, so they need the same treatment IA-64 and PA
>do in step-test. I also needed to finish stepping past one call before
>looking for the next or the test showed a bogus failure.
Is this a straight GDB bug?
It's a straight testsuite bug.  The test is full of assumptions about
when nexti will move to the next source line.
Ah, m'kay by me.  Fernando?

'Course.  Thanks Daniel.  Please check it in.

Regards to all,
Fernando

--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd.                     E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA/testsuite] Handle MIPS in step-test.exp
  - From: Andrew Cagney

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]