This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch/rfc] Remove all setup_xfail's from testsuite/gdb.mi/


Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 05:22:42PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >
> >> I think the patch, regardless of KFAIL, is still technically correct. It
> >> fixes a bug: the XFAILs are all wrong so removing them changes the
> >> testsuite so that the numbers it reports better reflect reality.  It's
> >> just unfortunate that part of the reality is a jump in testsuite
> >> failures.  Remember, the XFAILs were originally added to artifically
> >> deflate the test failure rate.
> >
> >
> > As you wish.  Michael's already said he just ignores gdb.mi; if it
> > picks up this many new failures, probably so will I.
> 
> So ..., what will happen when I submit an equivalent patch for one of
> the other directories?
> 
>  >  I don't agree
>  > that it's technically correct; the XFAILs were being used for a
>  > slightly suboptimal meaning since KFAIL wasn't available.  They aren't
>  > real failures no matter which way I look at it.
> 
> The ones I know about were real failures that reflected real bugs.  They
> were XFAILed to supress a bug that wasn't going to be fixed.  Grab an
> old GDB and check the comments that go with the a29k XFAILs.  That is
> very different to XFAILing something because it isn't possible to fix.
> 
> >> >  Would it be
> >> > hard to file PRs for all the failures you see and mark them KFAIL?
> >
> >>
> >> I think that would be a step backwards as all it would do is fill the
> >> bug database with reports like ``test failed''.
> >
> >
> > What do you want in the database then?
> 
> An analysis of the bug.
> 
> >> At least this does move things forward - it puts the tesuite in a state
> >> where everyone and everyone can incrementally do the marking.
> >
> >
> > But nobody will...
> 
> In one hit, or here and there?  I know I will.  I just won't be spending
> a solid week reviewing all of them.

Well, so far we've got two nays.  Why don't Daniel and I shut up, 
and wait to see if there are any yays?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]