This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Outstanding?
- From: Michael Snyder <msnyder at redhat dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 15:21:34 -0700
- Subject: Re: Outstanding?
- Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
- References: <3D93CD83.5020704@redhat.com>
> Patch that provides true single step for multi-threaded /proc based
The guy who submitted the above has never responded to email since then.
It's missing a changelog entry. Should I just write one and check it in?
> RFA (threads testsuite): More thread tests
This has been checked in.
> RFA: abstract out thread compilation code
So has this.
> Race condition in sol-thread.c
This one was rejected.
> TARGET_REGION_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT in target vector
> THUMB_FP vs. ARM_FP
Checked in.
> [Fwd: [RFA] Patch to correct problem with 'detach' on Tru64]
Checked in.
> [PATCH] Minor reformatting in infrun.c
Checked in.
> [RFA/controversial] move bp by line number past the prologue
Didn't achieve consensus, as I recall...
> [RFA] 2nd send: Solve the watchpoint failures on second run.
Rats. This one escaped. Jim or I should look at it.
> [RFA] Change to parse error reporting
This one was committed, and so noted on the list.
> [RFA] Don't coerce arrays if they're vectors.
Outstanding.
> [RFA] Fix watchpoints when stepping over a breakpoint
The last msg in this thread was yours.
> [RFA] GDB/622 - clear current breakpoint in commands causes trouble
> [RFA] GDB/624 - tbreak commands not executed when breakpoint hit
Committed.
> [RFA] Patch to correct problem with 'detach' on Tru64
Committed.
> [RFA] deleting breakpoints inside of 'commands'
Handled on a different thread, closed.
> [RFA] enable software single step on alpha-osf
Committed.
> [RFA] generic_dummy glitch in arm-tdep.c
Committed.