This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] struct context moved


Michal Ludvig wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> > > Hi all,
> > > the appended patch moved declaration of struct context and struct context_reg to frame.h, where these two are used in struct frame_info.
> > > OK to commit?
> > >
> > > 2002-07-08  Michal Ludvig  <mludvig@suse.cz>
> > >
> > >     * dwarf2cfi.c (struct context, struct context_reg): Moved...
> > >     * farme.h (struct context, struct context_reg): ...here.
> > >
> > > Michal Ludvig
> >
> > Michael,
> >
> > I don't understand the rationale behind this.
> >
> > As a general trend, frame.h / struct frame is becomming increasingly
> > opaque.  I don't see a reason for moving dwarf2cfi specific stuff into
> > frame.h.
> 
> Because we have
>         struct context *context;
> in the declaration of "struct frame_info", I thought it was logical to
> declare "struct context" in the same file. Otherwise, when debugging gdb
> itself, I'm getting "incomplete type" message when examining the content
> of struct frame_info. AFAIK it doesn't increase the size of the code, it
> just gives to debugger the appropriate information about the type of
> the structure.
> 
> Or am I wrong?

I don't know if this thread is still alive, but 
this change certainly seems wrong to me.  Most of GDB
does not need to know about these structures.  I assume
their use is strictly contained within dwarf2cfi.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]