This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Mips, return_value_location, small structs


I know o32 needs work too, but the two can be treated separately.
> I do guarantee that this patch does not make o32 any worse.
> In fact, I have been testing to make sure that none of my patches
> have made o32 any worse.
>
> Can I check this one in for n32, if I promise to work on o32 next?

Why not just fix this bug for all three ABIs?  o32 is just like n32/n64
in that it cross-eyes the arguments.

Andrew, o32 works as it is.  I can't find anything related to this
patch that still needs to be done for o32.  Unles you can suggest
something specific, may I check this patch in?
FYI, this patch should now be redundant. I rewrote the n32/n64 extract/store return value code.

Andrew



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]