This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: >, >>, and "tee" operators

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 23:14:57 -0400
Subject: Re: RFA: >, >>, and "tee" operators
References: <20020723183956.GA28558@nevyn.them.org> <3D3F5935.6070207@ges.redhat.com>

On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 09:49:41PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> The changes to ui-file.h and ui-file.c are approved.  That at least 
> reduces the patch a bit :-/
> 
> I'm pretty sure the tee mechanism will trip up when combined with the 
> page mechanism.  That, however, I think is a very separate problem --- 
> the page / <more> mechanism needs a major overhaul.

Thanks, I've committed this:
2002-07-24  Daniel Jacobowitz  <drow@mvista.com>

        * ui-file.c (struct tee_file, tee_file_new, tee_file_delete)
        (tee_file_flush, tee_file_write, tee_file_fputs)
        (tee_file_isatty): New.
        * ui-file.h (tee_file_new): Add prototype.

I'll repost the rest after we decide on what the commands should be
called, and I touch up the documentation.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

References:
- RFA: >, >>, and "tee" operators
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: RFA: >, >>, and "tee" operators
  - From: Andrew Cagney

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]