Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com> writes:
As a side effect, this patch no longer checks that the order is
correct. Is this intentional? gdb_expect_list might prove a better
choice since it still enforces the order.
It wasn't deliberate, but I think I like it anyway. :)
If the output from 'info set' appears in a different order, but the
stuff we're looking for is all there, I don't think that's grounds for
a failure.
The output from ``info set'' should be sorted(1). If it isn't sorted
i.e. is in a different order, we have a bug and, hence, the test should
fail.