On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 12:42:49PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
Just FYI,
I've committed this to the 5.2 branch - zap more __func__s. It's brutal
but it works :-)
enjoy,
Andrew
2002-07-15 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
* dwarf2cfi.c: Replace __func__ with "?func?".
Er, hunh?
First of all, is there any reason that __FUNCTION__ is not adequately
portable? I think it is. Second of all, if you're going to remove
__func__ you could at least replace it with the name of the function.
Remember this is a branch and those ``__func__''s were only printed when
there was an internal_error() - I don't think anyone is going to notice
:-). The correct clean fix was committed to the mainline a few hours
earlier (I looked at back patching it but noticed too many differences).