This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFA: next gettextization step
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 24 Jun 2002 23:45:51 -0600
- Subject: Re: RFA: next gettextization step
- References: <877kkqq6y8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <3D17D59A.1000308@cygnus.com>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> writes:
Andrew> If I understand things correctly, the main.c change can go in
Andrew> without the po/ change? The configure.in patch can also be
Andrew> split in two leaving out the po/ part?
There's no point in splitting the configure.in patch. The PACKAGE
subst is only used by po/Make-in.
Andrew> If this is correct then those parts are free to go in.
Thanks, I'm checking in the main.c change.
Andrew> I'd like to see the po/ directory issues resolved (I've sent
Andrew> an e-mail to binutils) before that is also created.
Ok. Feel free to CC me on that discussion if you like.
Tom