On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 06:20:22PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
Hello,
This finishes off (I think) the FRAME_CHAIN_VALID debate. It sets it to
generic_func_frame_chain_valid(). That function being tweaked to handle
both generic dummy frame and the old style frame cases.
I'll commit it in a few days.
Andrew
After this goes in, can we start switching existing targets? That
seemed to be the real point of debate - file_frame_chain_valid versus
func_frame_chain_valid. With the addition of a 'set' variable for
people who prefer the file_frame_chain_valid behavior, I don't see any
reason not to.
For natives (hmm, need a new name - UNIX like targets?) I think
definitly and asap. For more embedded targets, yes, with set - do any
targets have custom frame-chain functions?