This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: gdb.c++ testsuite 1.3: member_data_static.exp (resend)


Hi Benjamin,

mec>   (gdb) print test3
mec>   $2 = {static data = <optimized out>}

bk> ... which makes debugging C++ a pain in the ass, and the reason I sat
bk> down and wrote this file. I consider gdb to be broken. Hopefully this
bk> test case will facilitate a fix to the problem noted above.

As far as I can tell, gdb is reporting what's actually in the executable
file.  'test3' has one static member and no non-static members.
So perhaps gcc is broken, but I don't understand your view that 
gdb is broken.  Can you explain more?  What do you *want* gdb to print
here?

> Errr. No, unless you expect everybody using gdb and C++ do to this as
> well. In which case, you should put this in the FAQ.

Okay, I'll forget about my 'refer' kludge.  I thought that the 'refer'
kludge was working around a side issue, but optimizing away the static
data is the *main* issue for this test.  So I should not work around it.

Michael C


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]