This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Type cleanups

From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
To: drow at mvista dot com
Cc: ac131313 at cygnus dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, dj at delorie dot com
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 11:09:20 +0300
Subject: Re: [RFA] Type cleanups
References: <20020513003359.GA11672@nevyn.them.org> <3CDF3081.1020900@cygnus.com> <20020513135950.GB19484@nevyn.them.org>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>

> Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 09:59:50 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
> 
> 	Several targets (i586-pc-msdosdjgpp, sparc-elf, sparc64-elf)
> 	failed with this message (also JB_SP for Sparc):
> 
> In file included from /usr/include/setjmp.h:30,
>                  from ../../src-build/gdb/top.c:58:
> /usr/include/bits/setjmp.h:31: warning: `JB_PC' redefined
> tm.h:57: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
> make[1]: *** [top.o] Error 1

How come /usr/include/setjmp.h is being used for the DJGPP build?  It
should have used the headers from the cross-compilation toolkit,
i.e. the headers that come with DJGPP development enviroment.  And
those don't define no steenking JB_PC.

What am I missing?  Are we talking about building a native DJGPP port
of GDB, or about something else?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA] Type cleanups
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- [RFA] Type cleanups
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [RFA] Type cleanups
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [RFA] Type cleanups
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]