This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: [patch/rfc] h8300 Change literal reg numbers to REGNUM macros
- From: Andrew Volkov <Andrew dot Volkov at transas dot com>
- To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 17:59:26 +0400
- Subject: RE: [patch/rfc] h8300 Change literal reg numbers to REGNUM macros
Andreas,
I think difference of c99 and ANSI is offtopic here.
Are you have any suggestions about patch?
Andrey
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Schwab [mailto:schwab@suse.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 5:21 PM
> To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] h8300 Change literal reg numbers to
> REGNUM macros
>
>
> Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com> writes:
>
> |> Further, it's general to talk about 'ISO' when referring
> to c99. I said
> |> 'ANSI', which is usually taken to refer to the original standard.
>
> I'm pretty sure that ANSI has adopted C99 too. And C89 (well, C90
> actually) was an ISO standard as well.
>
> |> And anyway, the important point here is that GDB is not
> being coded to c99.
>
> No sweat.
>
> Andreas.
>
> --
> Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
> SuSE GmbH, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
> Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
> "And now for something completely different."
>