This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [rfa] Always define all of TARGET_SIGNAL_*


On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 09:37:47PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >I'm thinking of the net effect pulling both this patch and the other 
> >>pending signal patch onto the 5.1 would have.  (I'm not sure if you ment 
> >>this or that I was confusing this patch with the other pending patches :-)
> >
> >
> >The only patch I'd particularly like in 5.2 (not 5.1 :)) is the one to
> >make gdbserver use signals.h, which I was going to address after this
> >one was done (just to reduce confusion, not because of any dependence). 
> >I personally believe that pulling the others, particularly this one,
> >into 5.2 will do no more harm than pulling them into the trunk; every
> >day we leave them there is just a greater chance they'll be used this
> >way.
> 
> I'm certaionly ok with (re-)pulling include/gdb/signals.h and 
> include/gdbserver into the 5.2 branch - just as long as core GDB on the 
> branch doesn't get modified to use them.  This is also why I think 
> sitting on this enum patch until 5.2 is released is best/easiest.

Since both of these happened...

> As for what you posted, yep ok.  But after 5.2 :-)  Perhaphs a bug 
> report so it isn't forgotten.

Committed, thanks.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

2002-05-09  Daniel Jacobowitz  <drow@mvista.com>

	* signals.h: Update comments.
	(enum target_signal): Remove conditional compilation around
	Mach-specific signals.  Move them to after TARGET_SIGNAL_DEFAULT.

2002-05-09  Daniel Jacobowitz  <drow@mvista.com>

	* signals/signals.c (signals): Remove conditional compilation around
	Mach-specific signals.  Move them to after TARGET_SIGNAL_DEFAULT.
	(target_signal_from_name): Loop until TARGET_SIGNAL_LAST.

Index: gdb/signals/signals.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/signals/signals.c,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 signals.c
--- gdb/signals/signals.c	27 Mar 2002 05:12:35 -0000	1.2
+++ gdb/signals/signals.c	9 May 2002 22:18:45 -0000
@@ -180,7 +180,11 @@ static struct {
   {"SIG126", "Real-time event 126"},
   {"SIG127", "Real-time event 127"},
 
-#if defined(MACH) || defined(__MACH__)
+  {"SIGINFO", "Information request"},
+
+  {NULL, "Unknown signal"},
+  {NULL, "Internal error: printing TARGET_SIGNAL_DEFAULT"},
+
   /* Mach exceptions */
   {"EXC_BAD_ACCESS", "Could not access memory"},
   {"EXC_BAD_INSTRUCTION", "Illegal instruction/operand"},
@@ -188,11 +192,6 @@ static struct {
   {"EXC_EMULATION", "Emulation instruction"},
   {"EXC_SOFTWARE", "Software generated exception"},
   {"EXC_BREAKPOINT", "Breakpoint"},
-#endif
-  {"SIGINFO", "Information request"},
-
-  {NULL, "Unknown signal"},
-  {NULL, "Internal error: printing TARGET_SIGNAL_DEFAULT"},
 
   /* Last entry, used to check whether the table is the right size.  */
   {NULL, "TARGET_SIGNAL_MAGIC"}
@@ -237,9 +236,10 @@ target_signal_from_name (char *name)
 
   /* This ugly cast brought to you by the native VAX compiler.  */
   for (sig = TARGET_SIGNAL_HUP;
-       signals[sig].name != NULL;
+       sig < TARGET_SIGNAL_LAST;
        sig = (enum target_signal) ((int) sig + 1))
-    if (strcmp (name, signals[sig].name) == 0)
+    if (signals[sig].name != NULL
+	&& strcmp (name, signals[sig].name) == 0)
       return sig;
   return TARGET_SIGNAL_UNKNOWN;
 }
Index: include/gdb/signals.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/include/gdb/signals.h,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1 signals.h
--- include/gdb/signals.h	11 Mar 2002 00:01:11 -0000	1.1
+++ include/gdb/signals.h	9 May 2002 22:18:45 -0000
@@ -32,7 +32,8 @@
    Since these numbers have actually made it out into other software
    (stubs, etc.), you mustn't disturb the assigned numbering.  If you
    need to add new signals here, add them to the end of the explicitly
-   numbered signals.
+   numbered signals, at the comment marker.  Add them unconditionally,
+   not within any #if or #ifdef.
 
    This is based strongly on Unix/POSIX signals for several reasons:
    (1) This set of signals represents a widely-accepted attempt to
@@ -208,15 +209,6 @@ enum target_signal
     TARGET_SIGNAL_REALTIME_126,
     TARGET_SIGNAL_REALTIME_127,
 
-#if defined(MACH) || defined(__MACH__)
-    /* Mach exceptions */
-    TARGET_EXC_BAD_ACCESS,
-    TARGET_EXC_BAD_INSTRUCTION,
-    TARGET_EXC_ARITHMETIC,
-    TARGET_EXC_EMULATION,
-    TARGET_EXC_SOFTWARE,
-    TARGET_EXC_BREAKPOINT,
-#endif
     TARGET_SIGNAL_INFO,
 
     /* Some signal we don't know about.  */
@@ -225,6 +217,18 @@ enum target_signal
     /* Use whatever signal we use when one is not specifically specified
        (for passing to proceed and so on).  */
     TARGET_SIGNAL_DEFAULT,
+
+    /* Mach exceptions.  In versions of GDB before 5.2, these were just before
+       TARGET_SIGNAL_INFO if you were compiling on a Mach host (and missing
+       otherwise).  */
+    TARGET_EXC_BAD_ACCESS,
+    TARGET_EXC_BAD_INSTRUCTION,
+    TARGET_EXC_ARITHMETIC,
+    TARGET_EXC_EMULATION,
+    TARGET_EXC_SOFTWARE,
+    TARGET_EXC_BREAKPOINT,
+
+    /* If you are adding a new signal, add it just above this comment.  */
 
     /* Last and unused enum value, for sizing arrays, etc.  */
     TARGET_SIGNAL_LAST


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]