This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch/rfc] default REGISTER_VIRTUAL_SIZE and REGISTER_RAW_SIZEto register_size
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- To: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 09:57:58 -0400
- Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] default REGISTER_VIRTUAL_SIZE and REGISTER_RAW_SIZEto register_size
- References: <200205080937.KAA07603@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>
> Ok, you win!
>
> Actually, it was the regcache model that I was thinking about when I said
> that... Sorry for confusing things.
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2002-02/msg00254.html
> and
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2002-02/msg00255.html
>
> where you said:
>
>
>> I'll try to do the long (add to documentation answer, in about a
>> week - this really does need to be documented.
Oops! Thanks for the reminder. Lets call it a draw. I was thinking of
threads and/or frames next:
http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/onlinedocs/gdbint_3.html#SEC11
http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/onlinedocs/gdbint_3.html#SEC7
Andrew