This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PowerPC64 skip_prologue patch

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
To: Stan Shebs <shebs at apple dot com>
Cc: Kevin Buettner <kevinb at redhat dot com>,David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:49:52 -0400
Subject: Re: PowerPC64 skip_prologue patch
References: <200204240341.XAA30704@makai.watson.ibm.com> <1020424075830.ZM12269@localhost.localdomain> <3CC6D06F.5BFD3E8@apple.com>

> Kevin Buettner wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Apr 23, 11:41pm, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> 
> 
>> > What is the status of the PowerPC64 skip_prologue patch?  Without
>> > this patch, GDB does not recognize standard PowerPC64 prologue
>> > instructions which makes debugging very difficult.
> 
>> 
>> I'm working on it.  Since we don't have a copyright assignment for
>> these changes, [...]
> 
> 
> Huh?  IBM has an overall corporate assignment, just like Cygnus
> had and (I assume, not having seen it) Red Hat has now.

The last time IBM contributed stuff to GDB was the s390.  For that, 
individual electronic transfer letters were required.

Sounds like things have changed since then?

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PowerPC64 skip_prologue patch
  - From: David Edelsohn

References:
- PowerPC64 skip_prologue patch
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: PowerPC64 skip_prologue patch
  - From: Kevin Buettner
- Re: PowerPC64 skip_prologue patch
  - From: Stan Shebs

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]