This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] gdb.c++/local.exp: add pr numbers
- From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- To: dberlin at dberlin dot org
- Cc: ac131313 at cygnus dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 03:02:45 -0500
- Subject: Re: [patch] gdb.c++/local.exp: add pr numbers
Daniel Berlin writes:
1. Bugzilla supports multiple products by default, in a single database.
(Each product can itself, have multiple components, as well)
2. Bug ids are unique within a given bugzilla database.
Ah. Ok. So this covers the case that I care about the most, which is
referring to gcc bugs. As far as I know, gcc (broadly speaking, the
whole "gnu compiler collection") are the only Free Software compilers
supported by gdb. Although maybe my knowledge is limited?
> However, this *is* actually going to be annoying in the initial import,
> since it means that if they share the same bugzilla system (which only
> makes sense), i'll have to remap gdb's bug numbers to a new range (IE
> add 10000 to them. There are almost exactly 7000 gcc bug reports, and
> not going to be 3000 more before we switch)
So gnats bug #277 is going to become bugzilla bug #10277, for instance?
Michael C