This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Your patch to list.exp
- From: Fred Fish <fnf at fred dot ninemoons dot com>
- To: drow at mvista dot com (Daniel Jacobowitz)
- Cc: fnf at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 21:12:10 -0700 (MST)
- Subject: Re: Your patch to list.exp
- Reply-to: fnf at redhat dot com
> I just saw this on gdb-cvs. Was it ever on gdb-patches? I don't recall
> seeing it at least.
Yes, here is the URL to the original post:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-01/msg00115.html
There was also a reply from Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> which
I got in email but which doesn't appear to be in the gdb-patches
list:
I just came across this myself. I agree with Michael and Fred that the
isnative test is bogus.
Kevin
> Is it actually correct if you have debugging information for _start
> available? If we connect and are in a known line, presumably we will list
> there instead.
Hmm, don't know. I do know that I originally found this problem with
an actual remote target for which the patch is OK.
-Fred