Re: [PATCH] make MIPS sim mips.igen model names one per line.

[cgd at broadcom dot com]

At Mon, 11 Feb 2002 16:58:51 -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > In this case, I fail to see how _mixing_ them in mips.igen for a
> > single set of ISAs (the standars mipsI ... mipsIV, and soon to be
> > mips32, mips64), is the right thing.
> > 
> > One way or the other, I think it should be consistent at least for the
> > MIPS ISA 'models'.  There's no reason to have inconsistency.
> 
> Yes, the debate over this patch occured long ago.  My memory is that it 
> was agreed that the standard MIPS defined variants should all appear on 
> a single line but specific ISA implementations got to have their own line

If that's the way people want to go, I can do that, but:

(1) that is directly in opposition to what you indicated was your
    preference in December 2000 (see the mail I fwded you 8-), and

(2) I think it'll be easier for Eric to do his mips32/mips64 merge,
    then subsequently for me to merge the mipsV changes we have here,
    if it's one-per-line.  (In addition to being esier to get the file
    into the one-per-line state to begin with.  8-)


I just want agreement one way or another, so i can make it so.  8-)



cgd