Re: [RFA] Add handling of Ctrl-Break for win32 native target.

[Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>]

On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 04:19:29PM +0100, Pierre Muller wrote:
>At 16:08 04/02/2002 , Eli Zaretskii a ?crit:
>
>>On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Pierre Muller wrote:
>>
>> > Ctrl-Break exception is not handled by 
>> > current win32-nat.c code.
>> > 
>> > The following patch fixes this.
>>
>>IMHO, this should be mentioned in the manual somewhere (as a 
>>Windows-specific issue).
>
>   I don't undersantd what you mean here:
>
>should we document this as a known limitation of the win32 native
>target up to 5.1.1 or should we specify that Ctrl-Break gets also
>caught in newer versions of GDB?

I think we should document that Ctrl-Break does the same thing as
CTRL-C.

Actually, some people seem to think that CTRL-BREAK should send
something like a SIGQUIT.  That's not the way it works in Cygwin,
though, so the new behavior is correct.

cgf