This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] ppc: include register numbers in gdbarch_tdep structure.


> Though I do wonder if it was really necessary to move register
> numbers which are truly constant to the gdbarch_tdep struct.  BTW,
> this wouldn't bother me so much if we could use inline functions
> in C.


Based on the pains I'm experiencing with going through trying to get 
some MMX changes for x86 in a state where I can submit them, I suspect 
it is the better of the alternatives.

The x86 has a mix and that is just confusing.  I don't know what can 
change and what can't change and what secret relationships there are 
between the constants and variables.

On paper, it should be possible to describe the entire raw regcache 
using constants.  I'm finding that, in reality, until all the relevant 
framework is fleshed out (eg my regcache breakage, everything 
multi-arch) it isn't really possible.  Sigh.

enjoy,
Andrew



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]