Re: RFA: clean up logic in linux_child_wait

[Jim Blandy <jimb at zwingli dot cygnus dot com>]

Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
> > Well, the only thing that dies horribly is the three testsuite
> > failures I was trying to resolve.
> > 
> > Do you want my job?
> 
> Sorry for my tone there.

No, no, there was nothing wrong with your tone.  Your suggestion was
quick, simplified the code, and relieved me of the responsibility to
track down some bugs that, at the time I posted, I had no real idea
where I was going to go with.  So I'm quite grateful.  The joke was
that my work might get done better if you were doing it.  :)

> On Oct. 14, Mark Kettenis checked in a patch that was intended to make
> all Linux targets use lin-lwp instead of linux-thread.  The fact that
> S/390 still was afterwards was probably just an oversight; S/390 now
> contains the only reference to that file out of any port.

Yeah, I figured there was some kind of history behind it.