This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: gdbserver/{<foo>,<os>,<bar>}.c?; Was: [rfa] gdbserver overhaul

To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis at science dot uva dot nl>
Subject: Re: gdbserver/{<foo>,<os>,<bar>}.c?; Was: [rfa] gdbserver overhaul
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 12:15:21 -0400
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>,gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <20011011161453.A15989@nevyn.them.org> <3BCD045B.4050607@cygnus.com> <20011017002357.A25378@nevyn.them.org> <3BCDDD47.2010805@cygnus.com> <s3iofn1w94e.fsf@soliton.wins.uva.nl>

> 
> It just occured to me that if we really want to use a consistent
> naming scheme, we should probably use CPU-OS-low.c
> (i.e. i386-linux-low.c) just like we have CPU-OS-tdep.c and
> CPU-OS-nat.c.

Yes, obvious? :-)

References:
- [rfa] gdbserver overhaul
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [rfa] gdbserver overhaul
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [rfa] gdbserver overhaul
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- gdbserver/{<foo>,<os>,<bar>}.c?; Was: [rfa] gdbserver overhaul
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: gdbserver/{<foo>,<os>,<bar>}.c?; Was: [rfa] gdbserver overhaul
  - From: Mark Kettenis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]