This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: gdbserver/{<foo>,<os>,<bar>}.c?; Was: [rfa] gdbserver overhaul

To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
Subject: Re: gdbserver/{<foo>,<os>,<bar>}.c?; Was: [rfa] gdbserver overhaul
From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis at science dot uva dot nl>
Date: 21 Oct 2001 13:00:33 +0200
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <20011011161453.A15989@nevyn.them.org> <3BCD045B.4050607@cygnus.com> <20011017002357.A25378@nevyn.them.org> <3BCDDD47.2010805@cygnus.com>

Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> writes:

> > I used lnx-, because they needed to be 8.3 unique - isn't that
> > preferred to an entry in fnmatch.* (?)?  They were originally
> > low-linux-*.c instead, which was much more logical to me.  I'll go back
> > to that if the 8.3 conflicts are not a concern.
> 
> I think the ``keep it consistent and call it linux'' concern overrides 
> the 8.3 concern.

It just occured to me that if we really want to use a consistent
naming scheme, we should probably use CPU-OS-low.c
(i.e. i386-linux-low.c) just like we have CPU-OS-tdep.c and
CPU-OS-nat.c.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gdbserver/{<foo>,<os>,<bar>}.c?; Was: [rfa] gdbserver overhaul
  - From: Andrew Cagney

References:
- [rfa] gdbserver overhaul
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [rfa] gdbserver overhaul
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [rfa] gdbserver overhaul
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- gdbserver/{<foo>,<os>,<bar>}.c?; Was: [rfa] gdbserver overhaul
  - From: Andrew Cagney

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]