Re: set/show remotestopbits

[Mark Salter <msalter at redhat dot com>]

>>>>> Andrew Cagney writes:

>> 
>> I don't know what happened to Don, but I trust I don't want it to happen
>> to me.

> Everyone, including me, pulled Don in different directions leading him 
> to implement the same patch N times :-(

Ok. Well I didn;t expect to have the patch excepted on the first try. I
have a perfect record of having to rework things...

> My first thought is that, the ``serial'' (well serial / parallel / ...) 
> commands should be under:

> 	set/show serial XXXXXX
> and 
> set debug serial

> rather than ``set/show remote XXXX'' since they are not specific to the 
> remote protocol.

> Thoughts?  I'm pretty easy to convince otherwise.

I have no opinion on the matter. I just want something that lets me talk
to the target. I had been using a gdb with hard-coded 2 stop bits just so
I could get on with my work. I decided to be helpful and write a more
useful patch because Corinna has more pressing matters to deal with in
the project. If you add a "set serial" framework (or decide otherwise),
I'll be happy to rework the patch as needed.

--Mark