This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [rfa/expect] Add explicit build rules for tcl_regexp.c


Approved.

THanks,
  Ian.

Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I was finding that I couldn't build the expect in the CVS repository on
> a FreeBSD machine - expect/tcl_regexp.c was failing because it was
> including tcl/.../unistd.h instead of <unistd.h>.  This was occuring
> because HAVE_UNISTD_H wasn't defined.
> 
> The attached patch adds an explicit compile rule for tcl_regexp.c that
> includes all the autoconf -D... flags (esp HAVE_UNISTD_H) and hence
> (appears to) fix the problem
> 
> Ok?
>         Andrew
> 
>   --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Thu Sep 20 16:00:44 2001  Andrew Cagney  <cagney@b1.cygnus.com>
> 
>         * Makefile.in (shared/tcl_regexp.o, tcl_regexp.o): Add explict
>         build rules that include @TCL_DEFS@ in the list of compiler flags.
> 
> Index: Makefile.in
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/expect/Makefile.in,v
> retrieving revision 1.3
> diff -p -r1.3 Makefile.in
> *** Makefile.in 2001/09/08 06:26:30     1.3
> --- Makefile.in 2001/09/20 20:03:06
> *************** pty_sgttyb.o: $(srcdir)/pty_sgttyb.c exp
> *** 848,850 ****
> --- 848,855 ----
>   pty_termios.o: $(srcdir)/pty_termios.c expect_cf.h exp_win.h \
>         exp_tty_in.h exp_tty.h exp_rename.h exp_pty.h
>   pty_unicos.o: $(srcdir)/pty_unicos.c expect_cf.h exp_rename.h
> + tcl_regexp.o: $(srcdir)/tcl_regexp.c
> +       $(CC) -c $(CFLAGS_INT) @TCL_DEFS@ $(HDEFS) $<
> + shared/tcl_regexp.o: $(srcdir)/tcl_regexp.c
> +       $(CC) -c $(CFLAGS_INT) @EXP_SHLIB_CFLAGS@ @TCL_DEFS@ $(HDEFS) $< -o shared/$@
> +


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]