This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
[RFA] testsuite/gdb.c++/local.exp: work around "marker() ()" bug
- To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Subject: [RFA] testsuite/gdb.c++/local.exp: work around "marker() ()" bug
- From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 21:33:14 -0700
This is Sunday Project Patch #9.
This patch changes testsuite/gdb.c++/local.exp to use to library
function 'runto to reach a marker function. This simplifies the file,
and it accommodates a bug in gdb when using g++ v3pre.
The bug is PR gdb/34, "g++ v3 functions show as "inheritance2() ()"".
testsuite/gdb.c++/method.exp has one specific test case to detect this
bug, so I want to fix other test scripts so that they don't cascade
fail on this bug.
Before and after results with g++ v3pre:
before: 0 PASS, 3 FAIL, 0 XPASS, 2 XFAIL
after: 1 PASS, 2 FAIL, 0 XPASS, 2 XFAIL
I tested this on native Red Hat Linux 7 and native Solaris 2.6 with
gcc 2.95.3 and gcc 3pre dated 2001-04.22.
OK to apply?
Michael
===
2001-04-22 Michael Chastain <chastain@redhat.com>
* gdb.c++/local.exp: Use the 'runto' library function.
===
Index: gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/local.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/local.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -c -3 -p -r1.5 local.exp
*** gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/local.exp 2001/03/06 08:21:53 1.5
--- gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/local.exp 2001/04/23 04:25:26
***************
*** 1,4 ****
! # Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
--- 1,4 ----
! # Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
*************** if ![runto_main] then {
*** 61,85 ****
continue
}
! send_gdb "break marker1\n" ; gdb_expect -re ".*$gdb_prompt $"
! send_gdb "cont\n"
! gdb_expect {
! -re "Break.* marker1 \\(\\) at .*:$decimal.*$gdb_prompt $" {
! send_gdb "up\n"
! gdb_expect {
! -re ".*main.*$gdb_prompt $" {
! pass "up from marker1"
! }
! -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" {
! fail "up from marker1"
! }
! timeout { fail "up from marker1 (timeout)" }
! }
! }
! -re "$gdb_prompt $" { fail "continue to marker1" }
! timeout { fail "(timeout) continue to marker1" }
! }
# srikanth, These tests have always been run only with aCC. Now in
# the new scheme of things, we run it twice, once with aCC, and once
--- 61,73 ----
continue
}
! if ![runto 'marker1'] then {
! perror "couldn't run to marker1"
! continue
! }
! gdb_test "up" ".*main.*" "up from marker1"
!
# srikanth, These tests have always been run only with aCC. Now in
# the new scheme of things, we run it twice, once with aCC, and once