Re: [RFA] testsuite/gdb.c++/derivation.exp: use 'runto' library function

[Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain at cygnus dot com>]

Michael Snyder writes:

> Maybe we should add one, somewhere (if not in this file), 
> so that that bug cannot slip thru the cracks?

There's an explicit test in gdb.c++/method.exp that matches this
bug pretty well.

  send_gdb "continue\n"
  gdb_expect {
     -re "Continuing\\.\r\n\r\nBreakpoint \[0-9\]*, A::foo \\(this=$hex, arg=13\\) at .*method\\.cc:38\r\n38\[\t \]*x \\+= arg;\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
	pass "continued and got breakpoint in A::foo"
     }
     -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" { fail "continuing and breaking in A::foo" }
     timeout { fail "(timeout) continue" }
  }

gdb.log says:

  continue^M
  Continuing.^M
  ^M
  Breakpoint 2, A::foo(int) (this=0xbffff390, arg=13) at /vittone/fsf/2001-03-09/source/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/method.cc:38^M
  38        x += arg;^M
  (gdb) FAIL: gdb.c++/method.exp: continuing and breaking in A::foo

I'll add a note to PR gdb/34 that it's tested in gdb.c++/method.exp.

Do you want me to add a note to gdb.c++/method.exp that it tests PR gdb/34?

Michael