This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Assuming malloc exists in callfwmall.exp
- To: chastain at cygnus dot com, msnyder at redhat dot com
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Assuming malloc exists in callfwmall.exp
- From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:48:27 -0800
- Cc: ac131313 at cygnus dot com, fnasser at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, jimb at cygnus dot com, keiths at cygnus dot com
Hi Michael,
> No, the check is not useful. "call foo(10)" has nothing
> to do with malloc.
We've been through this.
How do you know that "call foo(10) does not use malloc"?
What is the source of your knowledge?
I know that "call foo(10) does not use malloc" because:
. I inspected the code
. I ran callfwmall.exp and it PASSed that test.
> Um -- Michael, did you get those two mixed up?
No.
Michael